Download-button_s

Experiment Overview

Repository ID: FR-FCM-Z4MA Experiment name: POISED MIFlowCyt score: 55.25%
Primary researcher: abhinav Kaushik PI/manager: Kari Nadeau Uploaded by: abhinav Kaushik
Experiment dates: 2017-10-25 - 2019-07-24 Dataset uploaded: Oct 2021 Last updated: Oct 2021
Keywords: [allergy] [CyTOF; mass cytometry; flow cytometry; standardization] [peanut] [oit] Manuscripts:
Organizations: Stanford University, Stanford, CA (USA)
Purpose: Oral Immunotherapy (OIT) is a promising intervention to treat food allergies. OIT induces desensitization, defined as lack of clinical reactivity to previously offending food allergen, while under active therapy. We sought to understand the immune mechanism of desensitization among study participants successfully desensitized to peanut following peanut OIT.
Conclusion: Our overarching aim for this study was to understand T-cell focused immune mechanism of Sustained unresponsiveness (SU) in desensitized participants following a period of allergen withdrawal. Using agnostic computer-based learning algorithms as well as hypothesis-based analyses from high dimensional immune studies, our findings suggest a pivotal role of CD8+ T cell differentiation status in defining the likelihood of SU. Our novel findings suggest that (i) lower frequency of terminally differentiated, CD57+ allergen-reactive, and allergen non-reactive CD8+ T cells, (ii) lower frequency of naïve CD8+ T cells, (iii) lower expression of CD86 on APCs and/or lower frequency of CD86+ APCs pre-OIT, and (iv) lower frequency of IFNg+ CD4+ memory Teffectors post-OIT favor SU.
Comments: None
Funding: This work was supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) under grants 5U19 AI104209-07, R01AI140134-01 and 5U01 AI140498-03, the Sean N Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research at Stanford University. Also, this work was partially supported by the National Institute of Health Grant P30-CA124435, Grant P30-DK116074, and Grant UL1-TR003142. Dr. Chinthrajah reports grants from NIAID, CoFAR, Aimmune, DBV Technologies, Astellas, Regeneron, Stanford Maternal and Child Health Research Institute (MCHRI), and FARE; Dr. Sindher reports grants from NIH, Regeneron, DBV, AIMMUNE, Novartis, CoFAR, and FARE. She receives personal fees from Astra Zeneca, DBV, and honoraria from FARE. Dr. Galli reports grants from the NIH; Dr. Boyd has consulted for Regeneron, Sanofi and Novartis on topics unrelated to this study, owns shares in AbCellera, has patents awarded or submitted related to immunoglobulin gene and protein analysis, and reports grants from the NIH; Dr. Andorf reports grants from the NIH. All other authors indicate no conflict of interest.
Quality control: For in-house metal conjugation, purified antibodies were purchased from BD Biosciences or Biolegend. Thus, each in-house conjugated antibody per batch of conjugation was tested and titrated using unstimulated and PMA/Ionomycin-stimulated PBMCs isolated from a buffy coat sample. Metal pre-conjugated, QA/QCed, ready-to-use antibodies were purchased from Fluidigm. The whole antibody panel was tested and validated for it's function using unstimulated and PMA/Ionomycin-stimulated PBMCs isolated from a buffy coat sample.
Download FCS Files or login and see the dataset in your inbox for further annotation details.